Saturday, June 6, 2009

there are ways to maintain relationship and the conflicts, can you choose wisely what to do? (5th entry, 4th week topic)

http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/SE%2BAsia/Story/STIStory_384358.html?vgnmr=1

This article is basically talking about a 17 years old Indonesian model whom has been married with a son of Kelantan royalty in Malaysia, flees from the prince, while she was in Singapore that day, and reached Jakarta – Indonesia in last Saturday with her mother. She has been married since August last year. The husband, Tengku Temenggong Muhammad Fakhry, and the wife, Manohara Odelia Pinot, are two famous people in their hometown. The husband is basically the prince of Malaysian Royalty, while the wife is a model in her hometown, Indonesia. The gap years between these two people are quite a lot because Ms. Manohara is only 16 while she got married with Mr. Fakhry, which is considered as a grown-up.


The communication interaction between them should be interpersonal because they are committing to spend lives together forever through a wedding vow, and this is included in dyadic communication because it only contains two people to communicate with one another. But instead, after almost a year of marriage, the wife felt that she was not in a “common” peacefully condition of being a wife. However, Manohara did not apply the DeFleur et all (2005) framework, where there are steps from the beginning towards the end which are: engagement, followed with management, and last but not least, disengagement. Manohara did face the phase of engagement and management before and during the marriage life, but after she was about to face disengagement, instead of trying to solve and discuss between her husband, she escaped from the fact and yet from the situation.


There were might be things that attract both parties at the beginning, such as the physical appearance, the woman might attracted the man. And also, there were also possibilities that the woman might become an exchange of rewards, which is about the mother’s or Manohara’s thoughts that Manohara could enjoy and became the happiest girl if she was married with the royal prince of Malaysia.


In this topic, the maintaining process from one and another parties failed because they did not end up in a peaceful way; instead they were trying to cover up their own side. This failure of maintaining is caused by the different perception they are facing after having relational challenges such as unrealistic expectation, aversive communication behaviors and aversive emotional states.

Based through Knapp Model of Relational development, they are facing the coming apart phase in specific; they were facing the differentiating part that may happen because of the reflection that has been developed too fast.


For my opinion, actually it is possible for the wife, Manohara, to solve the problems without have to act and bring this issue to the media, since as known that the husband, Muh. Fakhry is a royalty in Malaysia; she can actually try to solve the problems inside their own community through communicate what she is feeling and what she should have. Because if the condition is like this, it means that both of the parties cannot communication well in terms of verbal and non-verbal communication. However there are two ways to resolve the conflict such as functional and dysfunction. Throughout the article, we can see that Manohara chose to do the dysfunction instead of trying to build a relationship.


As human we have the ability to choose, what we can do is choose everything wise enough. To choose the relationship we build with, to solve conflicts between it. Are you ready enough? You determine it yourself.

9 comments:

  1. the media has always played a major role in the shaping of societal norms, as well as how we view and react to the relational formation of prominent figures in our society.
    this time it has gone a step further - by its involvement in this marital conflict, it has very possibly accelerated the 'coming apart' process. but it's actually stopped process at a whole new stage - stasis. it's a matter of privacy, and royal privacy at that. plus now there's the factor of community backlash. now that it's in full view of the public eye, how would this royal dispute come to a settlement? there's no simple sweep-and-bury-under-the-rug option now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah... Manohara...
    i think she is more popular than the three candidates (president)! i dont really understand what is she doing to blab her privacy to the media, but based on my opinion, she doesn't solve anything.

    its much more better if she and mom discuss it with the royal family no matter how annoying the matter is.

    yeah... rather than causing a mess.

    ReplyDelete
  3. first of all, by being a wife is actually to under the husband's rules and regulations (hahaha just like a country ey)

    if you have conflicts, any conflict, you should actually talk about it and manage it inside the roof (without having any third party is the best yet it is quite impossible)

    but, if the husband really was using hands and sharp things to torture Manohara, she should reported it to the police.
    Because it is already being called harassment in the body.

    ReplyDelete
  4. yeah I agree with all the people above who commented already. I mean well its your family business, although you are a public figure, why you share and even tell people all around the public media about it? Shouldnt you make it as your privacy and if you really need to share it to public, cannot you just share it after the things are more settled??

    This is a hard situation, I cannot say whether I should agree with Mano or not with what she is doing, but for me, in my life I will never do so! what a stupid thing to be done!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. im confused with celebrity, or celebrity-wanna-be....

    why they like to expose their individual life?
    just like "the newlyweds" of jessica simpson that ended up divorce.. so silly...

    manohara is silly...

    but still, if i was manohara, i might add some spicy thing into the cook...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah jon.. royalty used to be able to get away with everything. and the only excuse they have to defend themselves is, "I'm the king chosen by god. be thankful that I have chosen to bestow my holiness upon you through rape." Ridiculous. Thank god society has changed and these so called royals are now subject to the same treatment as commonfolk.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Being a part of royalty, it is inevitable that there would be media coverage. Also, perhaps by going to the media, it as an act of desperation. By exposing her plight to the media, the Indonesian model hoped to gain support of the public concerning her plight. We all know, especially in the traditional Malaysian family, that women may be considered a "lower status" than men. Maybe, on her own, there was little she could do to solve anything hence why she turned to the media exposure.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Manohara is FUNNY story though. It is a very complicated thing to be discussed through out the public but somehow she does it. And after all the gossips appear in the media, there is also news in some websites that she has boyfriend in SIM Singapore. So funny huh!!

    However, if we want to see through communication perspective, I believe both of the parties do not have "good" quality of it as we can see that they are going to be apart.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would say that either Manohara or her mother is very smart. If your cannot get things the straight way, then you just have to bend your finger. well, they must have been after something to want to expose themselves in such a way. Although, the media did not really prolong the news for long. it died out on the people really fast as i guess if you drag the same issue on and on it just gets boring.
    However, the media is smart to know when to push it and when to pull back in such a way that people still keep coming back to themf or more.

    ReplyDelete